When B.G.'s husband passed away, she became both a grieving widow and the personal representative of his estate, only to discover that a tangled web of family business interests and years-old deed transfers stood between her and the home and property she believed were rightfully hers. Southern Estate Lawyers stepped in to help her reclaim it.
When B.G.'s husband died, he left behind a complicated ownership picture: a minority stake in a family-held LLC, a disputed ownership share in an affiliated corporation, and deeds that had quietly moved the couple's marital home and other real estate out of their names and into the LLC.
The case became a fight on two fronts: whether those deeds were even legally valid, and how much of the family businesses B.G.'s husband had actually owned at the time of his death. The dispute was litigated in the Circuit Court of Baldwin County, Alabama, with a parallel action in Illinois, and was ultimately resolved through mediation for a total value of $1.5 million to B.G. Attorneys C. Randall Caldwell, Jr. and Dee Asthana led the case for Southern Estate Lawyers.
The deeds that moved the couple's real estate into the family LLC had been drafted by the LLC's own attorney, who was not licensed to practice law in either Alabama or Illinois, the states where the properties were located. B.G. had signed the transfer documents believing they were simply a liability-protection measure. She was not told their true purpose, and while she remained the record owner in name only, the LLC now held title to her home.
After her husband's death, this arrangement came into direct conflict with B.G.'s interests as surviving spouse and personal representative of his estate, triggering disputes over both the validity of the deeds and the true extent of her husband's ownership in the family businesses.
Southern Estate Lawyers built the case around a core legal principle: an attorney cannot draft a valid deed in a state where they are not licensed to practice law. The attorney who prepared the transfers was licensed only in a third state, and we argued that Alabama law treats documents drafted in violation of that rule as void from the start.
The opposing side pointed to a "Safe Harbor" rule that can sometimes allow an attorney licensed in one state to handle certain legal work in another, and we had to overcome this defense to establish that the deeds were invalid. A second front concerned ownership: the family's corporate records were disputed, with the opposing side arguing that B.G.'s husband held a smaller ownership interest than our firm asserted.
Southern Estate Lawyers obtained a written opinion from the Alabama State Bar confirming that the Safe Harbor rule the opposing side relied on did not apply in this case, directly supporting the argument that the deeds were void.
On the ownership question, we used the family's own tax returns as evidence: filings from one stretch of years showed B.G.'s husband as sole owner of the corporation, while later filings told a different story, undermining any claim that his ownership interest was smaller than asserted.
We were prepared to move for summary judgment on the deed validity issue if the case did not resolve at mediation.
"To our knowledge, this is the first time an unauthorized practice of law argument has been used to void a deed in Alabama. Florida courts had applied similar reasoning to invalidate real estate transfers prepared by attorneys not licensed in-state, and we saw no reason the same logic shouldn't hold here.
If you're not licensed to practice law in Alabama, you're not licensed to draft an Alabama deed, and the property doesn't move just because everyone signed on the dotted line."
– Attorney C. Randall Caldwell, Jr
"The irony wasn't lost on us. The stepchildren spent months arguing our client's ownership interest wasn't what it appeared to be on paper. We took that same reasoning and pointed it right back at them, filing a parallel action to have one of them vacate a property where their claim to stay rested on the exact kind of paper-thin title theory they'd been using against our client. If the argument was good enough for their case, it was good enough for ours.
Between the deed challenge and the parallel action, we weren't just defending our client. We were putting pressure on every front at once. That's what got this resolved at mediation instead of dragging into a multi-year trial."
– Attorney Dee Asthana
With a deed-invalidity theory backed by a written Alabama State Bar opinion, and tax return evidence undermining the opposing side's ownership claims, Southern Estate Lawyers held significant leverage heading into mediation. Our firm's readiness to move for summary judgment on the deed issue if the case did not resolve added further pressure toward settlement.
The case was ultimately resolved through mediation rather than proceeding to trial.
The case resolved at mediation for a total value of $1.5 million to B.G., made up of:
Beyond the financial recovery, the settlement returned real property, including the family home, to B.G. free and clear. Most importantly for B.G., she kept her home with her memories preserved.
This case reflects several hallmarks of how Alabama estate litigation lawyers at Southern Estate Lawyers approach complex estate and business ownership disputes:
building the case around a specific, well-supported legal principle (unauthorized practice of law voiding the deeds) rather than a general claim
securing a written Alabama State Bar opinion to directly rebut the Safe Harbor argument raised by the other side
using the family's own tax filings to challenge inconsistent ownership claims
preparing to move for summary judgment, which strengthened our negotiating position at mediation
securing a settlement that combined cash, recovered court-held funds, and the return of real property, not just a single lump-sum payment
Together, these elements show why families facing tangled estate and business ownership disputes can count on Southern Estate Lawyers to protect what matters most to them.
At Southern Estate Lawyers, we represent families across Alabama in all kinds of estate and probate litigation, from will contests and trust disputes to contested guardianships and fights over business or property ownership after a loved one's death. Take a look at our other case studies to see how we've helped families like yours.
See how Southern Estate Lawyers resolved a Baldwin County trust dispute for $445,000 after a trustee allegedly breached every duty owed to her disabled brother.
Read MoreSee how Southern Estate Lawyers resolved a Baldwin County trust dispute for $445,000 after a trustee allegedly breached every duty owed to her disabled brother.
Read MoreA niece and nephew attacked a properly executed will naming a late-in-life companion as sole heir, resolved for $380,000.
Read MoreWhether you're planning ahead or already facing a dispute, our Alabama attorneys can help. We represent families through both estate planning and estate litigation, and a free consultation with our team can bring clarity to a situation that may feel overwhelming right now.