L.O. was born with a disability that has left him functioning at a teenage level of maturity throughout his adult life. He cannot hold a job and needs help managing money, which is why, when his mother left him half of everything she owned, the people holding legal authority over his inheritance mattered so much. That authority ended up concentrated in one person: his sister. According to L.O., she used it to control, withhold, and take from what their mother left him. Southern Estate Lawyers stepped in to get it back.
Our client was an adult heir with a lifelong disability that leaves him unable to manage his own finances, along with the trustee overseeing his trust on his behalf. When his mother passed away, she left her estate, including a piece of land and an investment account, in equal shares to him and his sister, who has no such disability.
The dispute centered on allegations that the sister used the trusted roles she held over her brother's inheritance, as estate representative, trustee, and power of attorney, to control, withhold, and take from what their mother left him. In one especially troubling instance in late 2016, our client alleges she persuaded him to sign over his half of the land they had inherited together, to her.
The case was litigated in Baldwin County circuit court, related to a probate matter in Baldwin County, and was approached through mediation. Our client prevailed: the case resolved by settlement for a $445,000 payout. Attorneys Dee Asthana and C. Randall Caldwell, Jr. led the case for Southern Estate Lawyers.
Our client's mother leaves her estate, including a piece of land and an investment account, in equal shares to her two children. She names her own husband to handle her estate after she dies.
The husband passes away before she does. When the mother then passes, there is no one named to settle her estate.
Our client's sister asks the probate court to appoint her the person legally in charge of settling their mother's estate. From there, she takes on two more roles over her brother's affairs: she becomes the person legally responsible for managing his trust for his benefit, and she is given legal authority to make his financial decisions for him.
Holding all three roles at once, the sister has complete control over her brother's inheritance. According to our client, she uses that control to take from what he inherited, keep him from accessing it, and stop him from ever finding out what it was actually worth.
In one especially troubling instance, our client alleges his sister persuaded him to sign over his half of the land they inherited together, to her.
Our client challenges his sister's conduct across all three of the roles she held, seeking to recover what their mother truly left him.
Our client's disability sat at the heart of this case. Functioning at a teenage level of maturity throughout his adult life, unable to hold a job, and needing help managing money, he depended entirely on the people holding legal authority over his inheritance to act in his best interest.
That is exactly what each of those roles legally requires. Settling the estate, managing the trust, and acting under the power of attorney each came with its own legal obligation to put his interests above her own. Instead of three layers of protection, he allegedly got three avenues of control concentrated in one person, the same person who stood to gain from what he lost.
Every role the sister held, settling the estate, managing the trust, and acting under the power of attorney, came with its own legal obligation to act in her brother's best interest rather than her own. We built the case around the fact that she had violated all three at once, not just one.
We also had her own words working against her: her written answers during discovery and her testimony under oath in deposition did not hold up consistently, and we were confident a jury would see through it.
We pursued our client's full rightful half of what their mother left behind, repayment of anything taken or mismanaged, compensation for any drop in the land's value caused by what she had built on it, and additional damages meant to punish conduct of this kind rather than simply repay it. We prepared to take the case to trial if it didn't resolve, while still approaching mediation in good faith.
"He trusted his sister to be his estate representative, his trustee, and his power of attorney, because he had no real choice, and because that's supposed to mean something. When someone in that position allegedly takes land from a brother who can't fully understand what he's signing, and then keeps him from ever seeing what he actually inherited, the law doesn't treat that lightly. Neither did we."
– Attorney Dee Asthana
Heading into mediation, the case carried weight on several fronts at once: a theory built on three separate legal duties allegedly breached simultaneously, the sister's own inconsistent sworn statements from discovery and deposition, and a damages demand that went beyond repayment to include punitive damages for conduct of this kind.
We approached mediation in good faith while remaining fully prepared to take the case to trial, and the matter resolved by settlement.
Our client prevailed. The case resolved by settlement for a $445,000 payout.
For a man who allegedly had been kept from accessing his inheritance, and from ever finding out what it was actually worth, the settlement delivered what the roles his sister held were always supposed to guarantee: his mother's wishes honored, and his share protected. The $445,000 payout secured real resources for a beneficiary who cannot hold a job and will need help managing money for the rest of his life.
Trust cases like this one show how our Alabama estate litigation team works when a vulnerable beneficiary's inheritance is on the line:
building the case around three separate legal duties, as estate representative, trustee, and power of attorney, each allegedly breached, so the case never rested on a single claim
using inconsistencies between written discovery answers and sworn deposition testimony to undermine the other side's credibility
seeking not just our client's rightful half, but repayment of what was taken, compensation for the land's diminished value, and punitive damages for the conduct itself
standing up for a special needs beneficiary whose disability made him dependent on the very person accused of exploiting him
preparing for trial while approaching mediation in good faith, which strengthened our position at the negotiating table
When someone holds legal power over another person's inheritance, whether as trustee, personal representative, or agent under a power of attorney, that power comes with duties, and we hold people to them. Across Alabama, Southern Estate Lawyers has recovered millions for families facing invalid deeds, contested wills, exploited elders, and breached trusts. See our other case results for more.
See how Southern Estate Lawyers resolved a Baldwin County trust dispute for $445,000 after a trustee allegedly breached every duty owed to her disabled brother.
Read MoreA niece and nephew attacked a properly executed will naming a late-in-life companion as sole heir, resolved for $380,000.
Read MoreSee how Southern Estate Lawyers resolved a Baldwin County will contest for $3M after a will signed post-dementia threatened two sisters' inheritance.
Read MoreIf someone you love depends on a trustee, guardian, or power of attorney, and something about how their money is being handled doesn't feel right, trust that instinct. Records can be requested, accountings can be demanded, and courts can step in, but the sooner questions get asked, the more there is left to protect. Our Alabama estate litigation attorneys offer free, confidential consultations to help you understand what's happening and what can be done.